Skip to main content

Elephant


The elephant essay/notes



One interesting thing about this film is the lack of dialogue within in it, relying of other sound effects, as well other aspects of film form. A benefit of choosing to leave most of the dialogue out of the short film is that it forces the audience to pay attention to the other aspects of the film, as well as making the other, no dialect sound, be portrayed as louder and more jarring. This is particularly useful within this short film to make the many gun shots heard throughout the film, making every one of the shots stand out in the audience’s mind. Another way that the film focuses the audience attention on the violence of the film is through the repetition of long lingering shots on the victims’ bodies. The use of these shots forces the audience’s attention to the violence of the acts being committed, there is nothing to distract from the bodies, your attention is focused solely on the victim, the lack of sound ensures that there is nothing to distract the audience from the victim.

Use of narrative is effective in this film as it subverts the typical narrative story line, we aren’t introduced to any characters within the beginning of the film, we don’t get a story of why they are shooting people, we are just left guessing as to what is happening, and there is no explanation of the story line, or the motives behind the shooting. There is also no narrative conflict resolution, we don’t get a “happy ending” or an explanation of the ending of the film, instead we are left with ten minuets of men walking that ends with a man getting shot in the head. This leaves the audience unsatisfied and almost annoyed with the ending, I definitely felt annoyed by the ending, as the repetition of the film I expected something to change, and yet nothing did, it was the same consistent patten over and over again. The single scene with dialogue in it made me keep watching, as I expected the pattern to change, but instead it just remained the same, repeating over and over again, and yet the audience continues to watch, not quite convinced that it would not be different this time.

 The film shows the violence in Northern Ireland as pointless and unchanging. This battle is never clearly stated, but this film is a representation of the troubles and the other issues that affect Ireland. There is not a happy ending, much like the troubles, at the time the people of Ireland couldn’t see an end to the troubles and all the other issues that the people of Ireland were facing, and there are still underlying issues within the country due to these issues today. The film also shows the true nature of the war, with the character at the end of the film going willing to his death, like how the soldiers in the war go willing to their death, truly believing it was for the greater good.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Casablanca Characters

                                       -Casablanca- Rick Rick is the main character of Casablanca, he plays a man who was left by someone he loved (Ilse) and was changed forever. Rick is one of the people who are happy to settle down in Casablanca and isn't attempting to reach America (as he isn't allowed back into the country). Rick doesn't "stick his neck out" for anyone, and at the beginning of the film he is happy to just stay and run his cafe without being disturbed by anyone, however, toward the end of the film we see his aims change, he wants to help Ilse escape Casablanca with victor, he doesn't care what happens to himself, he just wants to protect his lover. Rick is meant to portray America at the time, who weren't currently involved in world war two) Ilse Isle is victors wife, and Ricks former lover, who left him in Paris. In the film we see her torn between Victor, her husband, and Rick. When she and Rick first started their relationship

Wasp (short film notes)

Wasp (short film notes) The beginning of this film could be compared to another film that we analyse within film a level- captain fantastic. Both of the films begin in the middle of the action with no explanation as to what is happening and no sound over the top of the scenes. Both of these film start of, not by aligning us with the parental figure, but instead allowing us to make our own judgment of the parent and their choices, but go on to explain that the parents truly love and care about their children. Another thing that captain fantastic and Wasp have in common is that the “main character” isn’t specifically just a lovable character, each one has flaws that get exposed as the film goes on, but both characters truly care about there kids, and when it comes down to it, choose to make the decisions that would benefit their children, rather than support their own personal gain. The films do not create loveable characters, they make relatable parents instead, showing the stru

Shaun of the Dead (a product of their environment)

The Product of their environment One way in which the Characters of the film are a product of their environment is the theme of pub vs restaurant that is present throughout the whole movie and is a divider between Liz and Shaun. Liz has overall more middleclass views, believing that she doesn’t want to spend the rest of her life spending everyday down at the pub, presenting the overall idea that Restaurants are better, and the more “grown up” (lamer) option. We can assume that, like the majority of characters within the film, Liz had a middle-class upbringing, therefore her views on restaurant over pub are probably a product of her upbringing, after her parents own relationship. Her whole aim is to try and turn Shaun into a middle-class adult, and to her, the only way to truly be an adult is to be a middle-class adult, she doesn’t consider the life that Shaun is living as an adult life. Another way we see the middle-class ideals of the film is through Shaun’s friend, Yvonne,